In the article, "Synchronous and Asynchronous Text-Based CMC in Educational Contexts: A Review of Recent Research", Johnson (2006) mainly illustrates how interaction between students and teacher to higher education has an impact on course satisfaction in all instructional contexts, both traditional and distance education. She discusses that the classes in higher education classes divide into two kinds: Synchronous and Asynchronous. Asynchronous based education has some limitations like “lack of immediate feedback, feeling a sense of isolation”, she (2006) says “… asynchronous online discussion was reportedly useful for “encouraging in-depth, more thoughtful discussion; communicating with temporally diverse students; holding ongoing discussions where archiving is required; and allowing all students to respond to a topic” (pg.1). As for instructional applications of synchronous technology, she indicates how it is useful in audio conferencing, video-conferencing, and white boards. As known, they are gradually significant modules of online learning. To give details she (2006) alleges synchronous chat was reportedly useful for “holding virtual office hours, team decision-making, brainstorming, community building, and dealing with technical issues”. (pg.2) I have experienced its usefulness in Web Expression 4 class and this class. During Web Expression 4 Class, a class creating a website related to an educational purpose, I faced different kinds of technical issues. Professor Lambert and I set a time to meet on Skype to solve the problems. She used the software named team viewer to see the problems and solve the problems. We discussed about the issues synchronously. This helped and encouraged me a lot. In this class, we met on Skype for our group project related to mapping and mash ups. These meetings were really helpful and encouraging for assigning the duties each of us would be responsible and understand what we will do as a team.
Furthermore, author (2006) states “Individuals who used both synchronous and asynchronous forms of online discussion were the most likely to complete required course activities” (pg. 3) I agree with her idea because both of forms have a different usefulness for teachers in terms of having diverse students.
In the article, “Using Synchronous Communication to Facilitate Graduate Students’ Online Collaboration”, the authors named Nancy J. Maushak and Chaohua Ou (2008) depict how synchronous communication has an impact on graduate students in terms of their online collaboration and perceptions of instant messages. The authors say that because online courses do not provide physically present both instructors and students, they should provide a good communication between them through real-time or delayed time. The authors mostly compare the differences between real-time or delayed time instructions. Even though delayed time (asynchronous) communication form has some advantageous over real time (synchronous) communication like allowing participants to discuss in anytime and anywhere, the article mainly focus on benefits of synchronous communication.
To give more details, authors mention where educators should use synchronous communication of instruction. One of them is for students’ group projects to collaborate them. According to the surveys mentioned in the article, real time communication has a significant effect on team based projects in positive side.
Besides this comparing and benefits of synchronous communication, authors also give some tips to instructors using synchronous communication in their instruction like keeping the group size small and assigning a group leader. At the end of article, authors mention about some surveys compared these two different forms of communication. They (2008) state about these surveys that “They suggested both discussion modes should be used in distance learning but for different purposes.” (pg. 2) Therefore, this article highlights the almost same thing just like first article: Educators should use both of communication forms in their instruction because both of them have characteristic benefits for different purposes of learning.
Personally, I have experienced all examples that are mentioned in two articles during taking classes during all master period and first two semester of my doctoral study. I believe if instructors apply both synchronous and asynchronous communication in instructions based on the purposes of the instruction properly, the instruction would be enriched more than ever.
For instance, instruction might use delayed time communication for text-based assignments which is required lots of time to complete, while they might use real time communication for group projects and helping learners for the issues they faced.
As for the last article named, “Adult Learner Participation in an Online Degree Program: A program-level study of voluntary computer-mediated communication”, it is mostly examined which factors impact participation levels in the voluntary CMC setting mentioned in the article. CMC (Computer-Mediated Communication) is one of the components used in distance learning environments. According to the results of the examinations, these factors are previous online course experience, course, and instructor. Thompson and Savenye (2007) also mention about synchronous and asynchronous communication to decide which one is better in online learning. They say it depends on the learners as answer. They allege that synchronous communication is the fittest form for particular learners, while asynchronous communication is the best for other learners. Lastly, at the end of the article it is mentioned that there are some surveys to find a relationship between participation level and subsequent performance. However, a clear relationship is not found between them. Authors suggest more work to clarify the effect of participation level in online discussions on subsequent learner performance.
To give more details, at the end of the article, Thompson and Savenye (2007) state that:
“…our results indicate that prior experience with courses in
the online environment does indeed impact the level of participation in CMC. The
finding that the level of participation increased as students gained experience with the
course environment suggests that there may be a learning curve involved in CMC
discussion and that participation may increase as students become more expert in the
CMC environment.” (pg. 10)
What I understand form this result is that learners should be taught in their first online courses properly because of prior experiences are crucial in their participation in online environments later. The first thing about this issue coming to my mind is that how students could be taught in their first experiences of online environment before they reach to higher education level. Which factor does play the biggest role in integration of technology in classroom properly in primary, middle and high school? Training of teachers? Money? Limited time of teachers? Or something else?
Firstly, I would like to mention about a common challenge: Money. Many districts do not have funding to purchase adequate equipment for certain types of telecommunications. Efforts to engage students in activities are limited by the lack of available technology and the funds to obtain them. I then went back to one of the teachers to get her opinion on BYOD (Bring Your Own Device). This could be one way to accomplish their telecommunication goals.
A second challenge is finding time for teachers to look critically at their teaching practices to determine their teaching philosophy and style, including methods, in order to implement technology that will support their efforts, not replace them or interfere with them. Schools (administration and teachers) have to be willing to invest the time to needed to understand their curricular goals and then integrate the technology to accomplish those goals.
For the third challenge, I would like to share my experience. In my experience I have noticed that a huge barrier preventing advancement of technology in education is first lack of teachers' time to learn how to use the equipment and lack of adequate training to make teachers feel empowered to jump in and use the equipment. The reasons we don't have adequate training seems to be a combination of not enough money to provide dedicated paid inservices where all teachers are required to attend, and perhaps an administrative lack of understanding of the importance of including this training in the budget at the point when the technology is purchased.